Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Maple Run board debates covering an expected $400K'$500K federal grant shortfall; asks administration to model options

November 24, 2025 | Maple Run Unified School District, School Districts, Vermont


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Maple Run board debates covering an expected $400K'$500K federal grant shortfall; asks administration to model options
District administrators presented a detailed grants briefing and warned the board of potential federal reductions that could create a roughly $400,000'$500,000 shortfall for FY27.

Administrators said consolidated federal programs (Titles 1, 2 and 4) show an allocation of $1,681,387 this fiscal year and about $410,000 in carryforward across the titles, leaving roughly $2,000,000 in investable funds for the current year. They said Title 1 and IDEA-B appear likely to be level funded, while Title 2 and Title 4 funding is projected to disappear in the coming fiscal cycle. The 21st Century/after-school program currently brings about $147,000 a year to the district; presenters said that program may be cut by roughly $72,000 a year, part of a broader potential loss in grant revenue.

"Is it the desire for us to manage the deficit of federal funds without transferring the costs to a local budget?" asked a presenter, asking the board whether administrators should assume the loss and make cuts inside grant-funded programs or plan to move some services onto the local budget.

Board members probed what "manage" would mean in practice: using local general funds to backfill services, identifying which services or positions would be retained, or cutting grant-funded programming outright. Several board members urged prioritizing student-facing services and asked administration to preserve the most essential supports.

Views among board members diverged. Some members said they would prefer not to use local funds to cover the full $500,000 gap and urged administrators to identify priorities; others said the district could find the money in a large overall budget to sustain programs. One board member summed up the direction to administration: "figure it out the best you can. We'd like these programs. Bring us back a budget that does that." The administration left with direction to prepare budget scenarios that reflect different levels of local coverage and program reduction and to return to the board with options.

Administrators cautioned that federal funding remains uncertain until state allocations are finalized and said further conversations will be necessary if actual awards differ from current projections.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee