PROVIDENCE — The Municipal Court of Providence heard four short matters during a single session, resolving two with monetary penalties, declining to impose a parking ticket in one case, and sending another matter back for trial.

In the environmental noise case identified on the docket as MC59159, the defendant Aja Delgado told the court she had been a guest but later acknowledged she had "co-hosted" the event. Inspector Quinn told the court the paperwork and statements were inconsistent and recommended "$100 or she can have a trial." The judge told Delgado she "would have got a much better disposition if you'd been honest from the beginning," and noted the inspector's recommendation; the transcript does not record a final disposition for MC59159.

In a separate speeding matter, the defendant acknowledged missing a prior court date after misremembering the scheduled date. The judge reviewed the defendant's driving record, noting prior speeding charges, and said he would vacate the default and impose a $96 fine while waiving the $35 court cost. "It will cost you $96," the judge said, resolving that case without additional sanction.

Carrie Hopkins appeared on a charge of parking during an emergency and explained she had driven to a friend's house after hearing there might be snow. The judge questioned the basis for that expectation and why Hopkins had paid the full towing fee. After hearing that Hopkins had already paid the tow company, the judge said he would "not charge you anything for the ticket," effectively declining to impose the parking penalty.

In the final matter, Jerome Musco Jr., who identified himself as a counselor with Scribe Behavioral Health and associated with Housing First, submitted a letter on behalf of "Mister Holder" regarding a handicapped parking issue. Holder disputed the court's recounting of past conduct and said he believed he was being targeted by police, adding, "Every year at Martin Luther King's day, I get a ticket." The judge reminded Holder of a prior dismissal but said the current matter was set down for trial and directed the defendant to return on the scheduled date.

The session reflected routine docket work: the judge emphasized honesty during proceedings, accepted mitigating explanations in some cases, and used the court's discretion to reduce or waive costs where he found it appropriate. No formal appeals or higher-court filings were recorded in the transcript of this session.