Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Administrative topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves minutes; staff updates on Red Gap Ranch and engineering work

Flagstaff Water Commission · November 21, 2025

Summary

The commission approved last month’s minutes by voice vote, heard that Jacobs Engineering remains engaged on Red Gap Ranch phase‑3 environmental work, and heard that the state ADWR will fund modeling for regional aquifer work.

At the Nov. 20 meeting the Flagstaff Water Commission approved its minutes from the prior meeting by voice vote after a motion and a second. No roll-call tally was recorded in the transcript; Chair Doba noted the motion carried on an "aye" voice vote.

In informational items, staff reported continued work with Jacobs Engineering on planning for the Red Gap Ranch project. Aaron (staff) and other presenters said Jacobs is in phase 3, focusing on environmental review and appraisal‑study work that aligns with the Bureau of Reclamation’s appraisal study; the bureau’s involvement could allow cost‑sharing for additional engineering. Staff said procurement and scope alignment questions remain and that they are working to avoid duplicative effort.

Staff also reported that the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) will provide funding for modeling work on the Coconino/Redwall and Wildcat aquifer systems, a development staff described as "good news" for the partnership’s modeling needs.

No formal council‑level decisions were made on Red Gap Ranch at the meeting; staff said they would return with updates as the appraisal study and procurement choices progress.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source