Citizen Portal
Sign In

Council approves developers request to pay below-market in-lieu fees for West El Camino Real condominium conversion

Sunnyvale City Council · November 20, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved De Anza Properties request for alternative compliance allowing in-lieu BMR payments (7% of final sales price) for a condominium conversion at 1124 W. El Camino Real; staff estimated roughly $16M from ownership in-lieu fees plus ~$950K in rental impact fee (estimates subject to final sales prices). Council asked staff to confirm whether fee calculation is based on 86 or 91 units after a revised tentative map.

The City Council voted to approve a developers request to satisfy below-market-rate (BMR) obligations for a West El Camino Real residential project by paying in-lieu fees rather than providing on-site ownership units.

What was approved: The developers revised plan converts an originally grandfathered multifamily rental building into condominiums (proposed 86 for-sale units plus five single-family lots), making 91 ownership units potentially subject to Sunnyvales 15% inclusionary requirement. Staff recommended accepting an alternative compliance plan that collects an in-lieu fee of 7% of final sales price on ownership units (collected at escrow on sale) and a separate housing-impact fee for grandfathered rental units (collected prior to certificate of occupancy). Staff estimated the ownership in-lieu amount could be about $16 million (market dependent) and the rental-impact fee approximately $950,000; totals may change with final sales prices.

Council discussion: The applicant, represented at the meeting by John Vidovich, argued the five single-family rear lots were created under a prior vested tentative map and should not be counted for inclusionary purposes; city staff and the city attorney advised staff would analyze that legal point and return a determination. Council approved the staff recommendation with a direction for staff to determine whether the fee calculation should be based on 86 or 91 units.

Why it matters: The accepted in-lieu payments would be earmarked for deeper-affordability projects (very-low and extremely-low-income households) and provide a concentrated pool of funds for affordable-housing non-profits. Councilmembers said in-lieu funds can sometimes be used to produce more deeply targeted housing than small on-site BMRs.

Next steps: Staff will finalize the legal calculation of the unit count (86 vs. 91) and proceed with the alternative-compliance framework; in-lieu fees will be collected at unit sale and rental-impact fees at certificate of occupancy as required by code. Council asked staff to review whether timing or partial up-front deposits are lawful under state law and the citys inclusionary program; staff said a related administrative study of the BMR program and in-lieu options is under way and expected early next year.