Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Wheatley Heights residents urge Town of Babylon to reject Bristol Industrial Park

November 20, 2025 | Town of Babylon, Suffolk County, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Wheatley Heights residents urge Town of Babylon to reject Bristol Industrial Park
Dozens of Wheatley Heights residents told the Town of Babylon board on Nov. 19 they strongly oppose a proposed Bristol Industrial Park and rezoning that would site warehouses and truck facilities near residential streets.

Speakers during the open portion said the project would transform narrow local roads into truck routes and harm residents' health and property values. "We can't handle that," said Margaret Hermatah of 20 Circle Drive, who warned of noise, traffic and health risks and asked the board to "support our community, not developers." Alana Ostebe of Colonial Springs Road urged the board to "please kill this project. Please vote no," citing air, light and water pollution risks and saying the plan would eliminate trees and wildlife.

Residents repeatedly referenced large development metrics they said were in the proposal: "380 truck bays and 1,900 parking spaces," Ostebe said, and several speakers said warehouses and truck staging would bring constant traffic on Little East Neck Road and nearby single-lane residential streets. Ruthie Scheck said the developer's environmental materials misidentified Circle Drive as "Nichols Road," which she said undermined confidence in the project's study.

Speakers also proposed alternatives, ranging from job-training and scholarship programs to converting nearby Pinelawn acreage to a nature preserve. Gina Schecht, a resident and trained pharmacist, raised public-health concerns tied to pollution and questioned the net local employment benefits and sales-tax gains the town might receive.

The board did not vote on rezoning during the meeting; the comments were entered into the public record. The transcript shows no staff presentation defending the plan or providing a developer response during the session. Board members acknowledged receiving heavy public interest and will treat the submissions and public record as part of their deliberation process.

Next steps: the board will retain public-comments as part of the record while future planning or zoning procedures — including possible public hearings, planning-board review, or formal rezoning votes — move forward on a separate schedule.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI