Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Group Home topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors challenge Phoenix House plan for three‑person sober‑living home in West Tuscaloosa
Summary
A Phoenix House affiliate asked the zoning board for a special exception to open a three‑resident sober‑living group home; neighbors and a nearby pastor urged denial over parking, safety and location concerns. Board discussion ended without a recorded vote at the Nov. 24 meeting.
Phoenix House representatives told the City of Tuscaloosa Zoning Board of Adjustments on Nov. 24 that they want to build a single‑family dwelling at 2212 26th Avenue to operate a Partners in Recovery two‑year sober‑living program for three residents.
Attorney and representative Brian Winter said the house would have one non‑resident case manager, strict rules (no drugs or alcohol, curfews and required recovery meetings) and a weekly resident fee of about $150 plus a deposit. Winter said the program accepts participants who complete Phoenix House’s 90‑day program and argued the site meets the city’s spacing and special‑exception criteria. “These folks are protected by federal law and state law,” Winter said, referring to fair‑housing and disability protections.
Neighbors and community leaders who live near the proposed site strongly disagreed. Mayra Craig, pastor of Faith Refuge Church, read a petition she said included 20 signatures and said she opposed the home being sited “in our community.” Other residents raised questions about narrow streets, the small cul‑de‑sac, parking capacity, how client drug‑testing would be handled, who would conduct tests and where clients would be placed if removed from the home.
Several board members said the petition appeared to meet many technical requirements but expressed hesitation about oversight and public‑safety tradeoffs when a house is distant from the program’s main facility. One member asked whether staff would perform the same level of inspection and monitoring if the house is not adjacent to the Phoenix House campus.
The board read the petition into the record and heard testimony from both sides; the transcript contains no recorded final vote on ZBA‑101‑25 during the Nov. 24 meeting. The case will return to the board for further action or scheduling as the board and staff determine next steps.
Why it matters: Group homes and sober‑living residences frequently draw competing community priorities — residents’ safety and neighborhood character versus provider access and rehabilitative services. The board will need to weigh the city’s special‑exception standards, federal disability and fair‑housing protections and the neighborhood’s concerns before taking a formal vote.
