Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Bremer County board approves routine claims and bridge bid pending review; delays final action on no-parking ordinance
Summary
The Bremer County Board of Supervisors approved the meeting agenda, minutes, claims and minor plats, authorized payment on a road-damage claim, and voted to award a bridge bid to Peterson/PCI pending engineer review; the board postponed final action on Ordinance 25-06 until a republished second reading.
The Bremer County Board of Supervisors recorded votes on several routine and project items during the meeting (date not specified). Key recorded items and outcomes from the meeting:
- Agenda approval: Motion moved by Corey, seconded by Bob; voice vote recorded and the motion carried.
- Minutes approval (Oct. 14–15): Motion moved by Bob, seconded by Corey; voice vote carried.
- Claims and issuance of checks: Motion moved and seconded; approved by voice vote.
- Road-damage claim: The board approved payment of a bill to remedy road damage and authorized the chair to sign an RFD agreement; motion moved and seconded and carried with one 'no' recorded.
- Ordinance 25-06 (no-parking): Public hearing opened for first reading. Staff reported publication reached Waverly only and suggested re-publishing to allow broader notice. The board closed the hearing and agreed to delay final action; second reading set for Nov. 4 after republishing.
- Bridge Project LL11257309 (procurement): Two bids were presented: Taylor Construction at $107,001.00 and Peterson/PCI at $87,308.07. The board voted to award the project to Peterson/PCI pending the engineer's review.
- Minor plats and surveys: Two minor plats (one described as the Keith parcel and one Wagner survey) were moved, seconded and approved.
- Adjournment: Motion carried and meeting adjourned.
Where vote tallies were recorded in the transcript, votes were taken by voice and the chair recorded aye votes; individual roll-call names were not consistently recorded in all actions beyond those noted above.
