Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judge seeks county seed funding to start recovery-court program; grant covers most costs
Summary
Judge presented a plan for a high-intensity recovery-court program to reduce recidivism and jail days, saying a State Court Administration grant awarded $105,000 falls about $30,000–45,000 short of the program budget; council approved smaller related appropriations and discussed using restricted opioid/set-aside funds for programming oversight.
The judge addressed the Scott County Council to request a modest county contribution to start a recovery-court program aimed at reducing repeat arrests and jail stays.
The judge described the program as “not a new court” but “a court program” that brings prosecutors, public defenders, probation, case managers and recovery-service providers together in a team-based approach for roughly 20–25 participants. He said State Court Administration awarded $105,000 toward a program budget he estimated at about $150,000, leaving a local shortfall of roughly $30,000–45,000. Key local needs cited were a public defender dedicated to recovery-court work and partial probation support; the judge said roughly $35,000 would cover a public defender position component, with partial reimbursement expected under state rules.
The judge argued the program would reduce jail population and save county dollars on daily incarceration costs: he cited historical jail-population drops (from roughly 180 to ~120 average daily jail population) and estimated that keeping daily jail population lower could save tens of thousands monthly.
Councilmembers and staff discussed alternative funding paths. One staff member suggested restricted local settlement/abatement funds could be used in a pinch; council members asked about sustainability, whether the grant is renewable, and the role of a local JRAC (Justice Reinvestment Advisory Committee) to vet opioid-settlement allocations. The judge said the grant is renewable and he expected state court administration support beyond a single year.
On related smaller items that appeared on the agenda, council approved two advertised additional appropriations connected to court services: $6,000 for mental-health evaluations and a $5,000 appropriation for attorney fees after the judge reduced his request from $20,000 to $5,000.
Council asked staff to coordinate with the commissioners and the judge to identify appropriate local match sources and to consider forming or using an advisory committee to vet opioid-settlement funds for such programs.
