Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Johnston County leaders review data-driven fire cost-share policy; vote deferred to January

December 02, 2025 | Johnston County, North Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Johnston County leaders review data-driven fire cost-share policy; vote deferred to January
Johnston County commissioners heard a presentation Dec. 1 from the county’s fire leaders on a proposed cost-share policy intended to allocate operational fire-protection costs between the county and municipalities.

Chief Chris Ellington, chairman of the Johnston County Fire Commission, described a four-factor, “data driven” formula that looks at call volume, in‑and‑out‑of‑town real and personal property, population and square miles protected to calculate each jurisdiction’s share. “This is all data driven. This is not opinion based. It is strictly based on numbers,” Ellington said.

Ellington said the draft policy addresses operational costs and fire apparatus and includes a separate approach for new fire‑station construction — requiring county approval for new stations that participate in the county’s fire protection district. He described an implementation schedule that could be phased over multiple years with annual review and then a rolling average to help towns and the county budget.

Several commissioners pressed on municipal impacts and how annexations — which change a town’s service area and therefore its calculated share — would be handled. One commissioner warned that prior actions (annexation tied to sewer agreements and future large residential developments) could affect a town’s participation number and thereby “further exacerbate the differential.” Ellington agreed those changes would affect the percentage towns would contribute and that implementation will be an important, and potentially contentious, element of the policy.

Ellington said the commission had met with each town’s fire chief and had offered multiple town meetings; he reported receiving four letters from municipalities (Clayton, Princeton, Micro, and Kinley) that generally acknowledged the need to evaluate cogshare but raised concerns about implementation timing and affordability.

The board did not adopt the policy at the Dec. 1 meeting. Commissioners agreed to take the draft under advisement and schedule it for consideration at the board’s Jan. 5 meeting to allow additional conversations with municipal representatives.

What’s next: The Fire Commission’s cost-share policy will return to the commissioners in January for potential formal action after further town engagement.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Carolina articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI