Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public Safety Committee backs reduced Summit County jail-bed contract to match current needs

Akron City Council (committee meetings) · December 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Public Safety Committee advanced an ordinance authorizing the mayor to enter an agreement with Summit County to guarantee 40 jail beds for Akron prisoners at a proposed 2025 cost of $2,976,300, down from a 2024 guaranteed-100-bed cost of $4,928,697; staff said average stays have shortened and usage is about 40 beds.

The Public Safety Committee voted to suspend the rules and give a favorable report for an ordinance that would allow the mayor or the mayor's designee to enter agreements with Summit County for the housing of City of Akron prisoners.

Director of Law Demetz presented the proposed jail-bed agreement, saying the previous long-standing contract guaranteed 100 beds and cost $4,928,697 in 2024. Demetz told the committee the city's actual need has declined because more people receive summonses instead of immediate custody and average stays have shortened to about three days. "So we haven't really needed a 100 beds. So we're down to approximately 40 beds on a regular basis," Demetz said, and noted the proposed contract provides 40 beds at a cost of $2,976,300.

Committee members expressed support for efforts to align costs with actual usage. The committee moved and seconded to suspend the rules and issue a favorable report on the ordinance; members voted in favor by voice and the chair closed the meeting.

The favorable report advances the ordinance for consideration by the full council. The agreement, if adopted, would reduce the city's guaranteed bed commitment and corresponding guaranteed payment to Summit County; committee discussion emphasized cost savings by matching capacity to present demand but did not include contract text or long-term financial modeling in the meeting record.