Waunakee budget panel outlines options to cut $2.3 million levy, shifts enrollment forecasting

Waunakee Community School District Budget Committee · December 1, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Waunakee Community School District budget committee reviewed options to reduce a $2.3 million referendum debt-service levy and adopted a shift from a five-year to a three-year enrollment projection model to better reflect recent smaller cohorts. The committee set a January follow-up to review financing schedules and open-enrollment impacts.

The Waunakee Community School District budget committee reviewed strategies to meet a board commitment to reduce the referendum debt-service tax levy by $2.3 million and approved next steps to analyze financing options.

Speaker 3 told the committee the board’s reductions can be achieved by one or more of three financial strategies: refinancing existing debt, using savings from the November 2022 referendum projects, or applying a federal clean-energy rebate. "Refinancing existing debt would add interest to our long-term debt service schedule but would not force us to use project savings or the clean-energy rebate," Speaker 3 said, adding that each option has different implications for future maintenance projects.

Committee members were also briefed on budget assumptions for 2026–27: a 5% salary-cost projection (approximately CPI plus step increases), a projected 5% health-insurance increase that would likely shift more cost to employees, and a conservative assumption for special-education categorical aid (district planning at 42% versus 45% in the state budget). "We’re taking a conservative approach because some of these state revenue numbers are unpredictable," Speaker 3 said.

To improve enrollment forecasting, the committee approved moving from a five-year to a three-year projection model after the five-year model overestimated growth for 2024–25. Under the three-year model, Speaker 3 said, the district projects 4,393 students (an increase of 24), largely because the upcoming graduating class is unusually small (309 students), reducing the expected gap with incoming kindergarteners.

Speaker 3 asked the committee to reconvene in January to review a debt-service schedule that would address the $2.3 million reduction and to show how a possible high-school capital referendum might affect long-term borrowing and levy calculations. The committee will also discuss open-enrollment parameters at that meeting, including whether to publicize capacity to the broader Dane County community.

No formal board-level decisions on refinancing or use of referendum funds were taken; the committee requested further analysis and scheduled follow-up work for January.