Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Denton County votes unanimously to retain Matthew Shields' firm to defend Akbar lawsuit; judge authorized to sign contract

December 02, 2025 | Denton County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Denton County votes unanimously to retain Matthew Shields' firm to defend Akbar lawsuit; judge authorized to sign contract
Denton County commissioners reconvening from executive session voted unanimously to retain outside counsel to represent the county in Shazad Akbar v. Denton County (case no. 425CB00974), a federal lawsuit currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division. The court named the law firm of Matthew Shields as counsel and authorized the Denton County judge to sign a contract of employment with the firm, exempting that contract from the requirement established by Local Government Code section 262.023.

The chair moved for approval of the assignment of counsel, noting the case number and court, and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Williams. “All in favor, say aye,” the chair called; after the verbal 'aye' votes the chair said the motion “carries unanimously.” The motion included three parts: assigning representation in the cited case, exempting the contract from Local Government Code §262.023, and authorizing the judge to execute the contract on the county’s behalf.

Local Government Code section 262.023 was cited during the motion as the statutory procurement provision from which the proposed employment contract would be exempt; the transcript does not provide additional detail about the legal or financial terms of the contract, including fee amounts or the contract's effective dates. The court did not announce a roll-call vote or provide a numerical tally; the chair characterized the outcome as unanimous.

Next steps recorded in the meeting are administrative: the county judge is authorized to sign the employment contract with the named law firm. The transcript does not show further discussion of the underlying litigation or contract terms during this session.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI