Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Oe 14 Instructional Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board narrows OE‑14 language to clarify equitable credit‑earning access after Skyline teachers warn of IB impact
Summary
After teachers from Skyline High School warned that mandating an AP course for ninth grade would disrupt IB scaffolding and student wellness, the board revised OE‑14 to separate career/CTE, equitable credit‑earning opportunities, and school‑level offerings and approved the amended language.
The Issaquah School District board approved a language revision to Operational Expectation 14 (instructional program) on Nov. 13 after a lengthy public exchange and board deliberation aimed at clarifying access to credit‑bearing courses and preserving unique school offerings.
Public commenters from Skyline High School — Molly Peterson (co‑chair, Skyline humanities) and teacher Courtney Beatty — told the board they fear an added requirement to offer an AP social studies course for ninth grade would disrupt IB program scaffolding and impose untenable changes for teachers. “The change you are proposing to OE 14 will require that Skyline add an AP social studies course at ninth grade,” Peterson said, adding that ninth graders may not be ready for college‑level coursework. Beatty said, “14 year olds are not necessarily ready for that pressure.”
Board members said those concerns prompted a redraft that detethers college credit‑earning opportunities from specific program models and divides the prior clause into clearer subparts: (a) ensure career‑connected opportunities and credentialing, (b) emphasize equitable access to credit‑earning opportunities, and (c) preserve unique school‑level offerings while setting a baseline expectation that comprehensive high schools will provide college and advanced‑placement opportunities. The board added language clarifying that baseline offerings apply to all comprehensive high schools to avoid uneven access.
Director Mullings and Director Gallinger jointly described the edited language as a clarifying rather than substantive change to what the board discussed in earlier sessions. After additional discussion and a successful motion and amendment, the board approved the language revision on a voice vote. Students participating in the meeting were polled for an advisory preference; the student reps’ advisory vote on the amended language was unanimous.
Board members said staff will work on implementation details — including exploring online AP options and how offerings would be scheduled at schools with different models such as IB or mastery‑based programs — and report back to the board before final program changes are implemented.
