Graham County approves higher pay placement to recruit detention registered nurse

Graham County Board of Supervisors · December 2, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Graham County Board approved placing a newly hired detention registered nurse at salary range 24, step 9 to reflect nearly 25 years’ experience and improve recruitment after 2½ years of unsuccessful advertising; the board discussed pay equity for existing staff but approved the placement by voice vote.

The Graham County Board of Supervisors approved a salary placement to recruit a detention registered nurse, moving the new hire to salary range 24, step 9 based on prior experience.

Brian Douglas of the health department told the board the county has advertised for the detention nurse position for two-and-a-half years with few qualified applicants and that increasing pay was intended to attract candidates. "We've advertised for 2 and a half years for a detention nurse," Douglas said, adding that the identified candidate has extensive experience.

Board members expressed support for competitive pay but asked about internal equity for existing employees if a new hire is placed at a higher rate. Manager Welker and others clarified that the placement is within the established pay range and is commensurate with the candidate’s nearly 25 years of nursing experience; Welker said that placing the hire on the appropriate step for experience does not require immediate adjustments to other employees' pay.

Vice Chairman David moved to approve the salary placement; the board seconded the motion and approved it by voice vote. The action is intended to fill a long-open public-safety health position and improve service at the jail while preserving internal pay-scale rules.

The county will proceed with onboarding the candidate at the approved step; any future decisions about broader pay adjustments for existing staff were discussed as a separate management consideration and were not mandated by this motion.