Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Treasurer: Lakewood faces multi‑million dollar shortfall; board shown levy options

December 02, 2025 | Lakewood City, School Districts, Ohio


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Treasurer: Lakewood faces multi‑million dollar shortfall; board shown levy options
Lakewood City Schools’ treasurer presented a multi‑year financial forecast Dec. 1 that projects growing operating pressure and potential ballot options to maintain services.

Treasurer Kent Zeman said the district expects expenditures to outpace revenues by about $4.5 million in fiscal year 2026, following a roughly $1.9 million shortfall in the prior fiscal year. He described the district as a “personal services business,” noting 83% of expenditures are salaries and benefits and that state funding as a share of general fund revenues has declined in recent years.

Zeman showed projected 'true days cash' of 174 days in 2026, which the forecast brings to a negative 41 days by 2030 under current assumptions. To address the gap, he outlined three operating levy scenarios for a potential 2026 ballot: 5.9, 6.9, or 7.9 mills. The presentation explained a recent $33 million refunding of debt service will lower scheduled debt millage beginning in 2026, producing about a 2‑mill net reduction in household tax impact; as a result a 6.9‑mill operating levy would have an estimated net taxpayer impact of roughly $171.50 annually on a $100,000 home (the gross 6.9‑mill calculation was $241.50 before the debt reduction).

Board members discussed timing tradeoffs: placing a lower‑millage levy earlier could require returning to voters sooner, while delaying a levy typically increases required millage to keep pace with inflation. Zeman emphasized assumptions in the forecast—including continued status as a 'guarantee' district under current state law—are subject to change and that any state policy shifts or revenue changes would alter the projections.

The board did not take a binding levy vote during the Dec. 1 meeting; staff described the scenarios, next steps and voter‑timing considerations to inform future decisions.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Ohio articles free in 2025

https://workplace-ai.com/
https://workplace-ai.com/