Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board debates OE‑9 public‑engagement language, agrees to move complaint/engagement specifics into indicators

December 02, 2025 | Racine Unified School District, School Districts, Wisconsin


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board debates OE‑9 public‑engagement language, agrees to move complaint/engagement specifics into indicators
RACINE, Wis. — The Racine Unified School District board reviewed proposed language for OE‑9, the district’s external/public‑engagement policy, and discussed whether additions recently proposed broaden the policy beyond communications into governance and evaluation.

Items under discussion included adding guidance on information about the district’s financial condition, a provision that external communications effectively handle complaints and a clause on maintaining an organizational culture that treats people with respect and includes those affected in decisions. "I don't know why it was included either, but I have to say, when you see a superintendent who does not effectively handle complaints ... that's all I can say," said Missus Barbian during the review, citing past experience with prior administration conduct.

Superintendent Soren Gajewski told the board staff would refine the language and indicators to make expectations measurable: "If 'effectively handle complaints' means every single person is happy all the time ... we'll put that into those indicators ... addresses them in a timely manner and tries to work to resolutions," he said. Board members and staff debated whether items 3–5 belonged in the policy text or were better expressed as indicators or interpretations that would become part of evaluation measures.

After discussion the board agreed with a staff proposal to remove items 3, 4 and 5 from the OE text and ask staff to incorporate related expectations into indicators and measurable evidence. Staff will return indicator proposals in January and include the revised OE for business‑meeting consideration.

Board members raised governance and measurement concerns — for example, how to define "adequately informed" or how to measure organizational culture — and suggested that indicators include evidence such as published communications, timelines and complaint‑response metrics rather than broad policy wording.

The board took no immediate policy vote; the procedural outcome is a referral to staff to draft indicators and a redlined OE for future board action.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Wisconsin articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI