Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

West Richland sees stronger sales-tax receipts but weaker permit revenue in Q3, finance director says

December 03, 2025 | West Richland, Benton County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

West Richland sees stronger sales-tax receipts but weaker permit revenue in Q3, finance director says
Finance Director Erin Glynn presented the City of West Richland’s third-quarter financial report to the council on Dec. 2, outlining economic indicators, revenue sources and fund-level trends.

Glynn told the council the general fund "collected approximately 37% of budgeted revenues" through the third quarter and said, "Good news is sales tax revenue has seen an increase of 18%." She also noted an offsetting decline in building‑permit revenue, which was "37%" lower than last year, and fewer multifamily permits this year compared with 40 in 2024.

The presentation highlighted several fund-level details: the general fund continues to be driven by taxes (about 66% of revenue), with sales, property and utility taxes the primary components; utility-tax revenue was up about 6% relative to the prior third quarter, and property-tax collections rose about 6% year over year (with staff noting timing and new‑construction effects on that figure). Glynn said the city has collected roughly the expected share of revenues for the biannual budget and that the city keeps conservative projections for real-estate excise tax (REET/REIT) receipts used to fund capital projects.

Council members followed with technical questions. Council member Blum asked whether attached rowhouses and townhouses are treated as single‑family for code purposes; building‑official staff explained that attached single‑family (row/townhouse) units are categorized as single‑family under the building code. The council also discussed transfers to support well and street projects and the timing of delinquent tax recognition as explanations for year‑over‑year changes in property‑tax receipts.

The report concluded after a short question-and-answer period, with staff noting that capital-project reimbursements (including work on State Route 224) have increased activity in project funds.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI