Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Shelton council awards $2.66 million reclaimed-water tank contract, flags $295,671 funding gap

December 03, 2025 | Shelton, Mason County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Shelton council awards $2.66 million reclaimed-water tank contract, flags $295,671 funding gap
The Shelton City Council on Dec. 2 adopted a resolution awarding a contract to Roblin's Gate to build a 500,000-gallon reclaimed-water storage tank, a project city staff and council said will expand irrigation, industrial reuse and groundwater recharge capacity.

Assistant Public Works Director Grama Armstrong told the council the city received four bids; the qualifying low bid was $2,663,076.82. Current storage capacity is roughly 35,000 gallons, Armstrong said, and the new tank will increase available reclaimed-water storage substantially.

Armstrong said the city has identified a funding shortfall of about $295,671. “We do need to bridge the gap of our funding for about $295,671,” Armstrong said, and staff are reallocating some supplemental funds and seeking matching grants to close the gap.

Council then voted to adopt resolution 1415-1025, awarding the reclaimed-water tank project to Roblin's Gate and authorizing the city manager to execute contract documents for contract number 25-005-LE. A council member praised the timing to use funds that might otherwise expire and said the project supports water management priorities.

The project is part of a series of water-system upgrades the city is pursuing, including headworks and future groundwater recharge work. No separate bid protest or formal challenge was recorded in the meeting minutes; council approved the resolution by voice vote with the chair saying, “Motion carries.”

Next steps reported at the meeting include finalizing contract documents and pursuing the matching funds Armstrong referenced; council did not set a different effective date for construction start in the adopted resolution.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI