Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Cip topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs using oil terminal tax revenue for 2018 capital projects; motion fails
Summary
Councilors questioned relying on oil pipeline terminal tax receipts to support the capital improvement program (CIP) and balance budgets; after debate the motion to approve the proposed CIP adjustments tied to terminal tax projections failed on roll call.
The Superior Common Council debated Aug. 1 whether to apply projected oil pipeline terminal tax revenue to the city’s capital improvement program and general fund needs.
Finance staff proposed adjustments based on terminal tax revenue projections for 2018–2022. Councilors raised concerns that using the terminal tax to backfill recurring general fund needs could set a risky precedent if revenues decline. Councilor Kern and others questioned multi-year reliance on projected terminal tax receipts and urged caution; finance staff and the mayor characterized the proposal as tentative and said annual review would occur.
Councilors pressed staff on the size and timing of projected transfers, including a $500,000 transfer to the economic development fund that staff said would remain unchanged. The council discussed the CIP’s multi-year assumptions, whether the terminal tax should be treated as one-time or ongoing revenue, and whether the city was ‘kicking the can’ by relying on pipeline-related receipts.
After discussion, the motion to approve the adjustments failed on roll call. Councilors requested that the mayor and finance staff present the full budget and provide additional detail on long-term fiscal plans at the upcoming budget presentations and at a finance committee briefing in August.
