Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Santa Monica sustainability commission votes to favor natural replacements over turf; directs staff to seek durable grass alternatives

November 21, 2025 | Santa Monica City, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Santa Monica sustainability commission votes to favor natural replacements over turf; directs staff to seek durable grass alternatives
The commission debated city staff’s proposed policy on artificial turf and natural grass for city‑owned sports fields and, after extended public comment and staff briefing, passed a motion directing staff to change the replacement approach for existing turf.

Public speakers—including Diane Wolke of Safe Healthy Playlands, neighborhood coalition leaders and sports advocates—urged the commission to ban synthetic turf on environmental and health grounds. Wolke told commissioners that regulators and environmental groups have raised concerns about microplastics, PFAS and other potential chemical contaminants, and she cited recent moves by outside agencies (including a reference to a California Coastal Commission precaution regarding synthetic turf permits) and Los Angeles Unified School District consideration of transitions away from turf.

Amelia Feichner, city architect and lead staff on the proposal, described the staff analysis and policy approach focused on city‑owned sports fields: staff recommended no new artificial turf installations on city fields, maintaining existing grass fields as grass, pursuing natural‑field pilots to improve playability, and retaining artificial turf for high‑intensity rectangular fields if replacement is required but only with strong safeguards (batch testing for chemical thresholds, drainage control, walk‑off mats and long‑term monitoring). Feichner said staff’s lifecycle cost analysis showed grass and turf can be roughly comparable over the field lifetime when installation, maintenance and replacement are considered.

Commission Chair Dean Koubani proposed an edited motion that removed the staff’s fallback of replacing end‑of‑life turf with new artificial turf and instead directed that, when existing turf fields reach the end of their useful life, the city should solicit bids for durable natural alternatives and commit to phasing turf out where practicable. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.

In discussion, commissioners pressed staff on whether local testing of runoff or outgassing had been done (staff said they had reviewed the literature but had not conducted local testing), pilot‑testing opportunities for higher‑performance natural grass blends, and filtration and mitigation measures for any existing turf replacements. Staff said the internal task force will reconvene to review public comment and bring an information item to City Council; the commission also discussed outreach to ensure the commission’s position is communicated to council.

Action taken: the commission voted to (1) support no new artificial turf on city‑owned sports fields; (2) keep existing grass fields as grass; and (3) require that when artificial turf fields reach end of life the city pursue durable natural alternatives in replacement bids. Commissioners recorded the motion and it passed unanimously.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal