Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board defers vote on SRO contract with APD, requests final revised contract

Asheville City Schools Board of Education · November 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

School board members asked for a corrected, updated copy of the SRO contract with the Asheville Police Department before voting; the contract lists five SRO positions, the district currently has four, and board members asked for flexibility and clarification on staffing and term details.

The Asheville City Schools Board of Education discussed its school‑resource‑officer contract with the Asheville Police Department and agreed not to place the item on the consent agenda until the board receives the revised contract.

The chair noted the most recent contract posted online had formatting and dating errors and that the revised copy linked to the agenda folder did not appear to be the most current. Board members asked for clarification on staffing levels and contract language. The contract currently specifies that the contractor will supply the services of five SROs; staff explained the district presently has four SROs assigned and that the district pays only for positions filled. One member requested flexibility in the contract to allow an additional half position or temporary staffing if needed.

Superintendent Maggie Fuhrman and district staff said they have been working with APD to restore the fifth SRO and hope to have that position filled in January; they reiterated that the district pays only for officers actually provided. Board members directed staff to share the corrected contract as soon as possible so the board can review and vote at the next meeting.

What’s next: staff will upload the corrected contract and the board will have the opportunity to ask specific follow‑up questions before a scheduled vote. The board’s procedural direction was to hold the APD/SRO contract for separate discussion rather than handling it on consent.