Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District reports multi‑year K–8 gains and narrowing gaps, highlights middle‑school math challenges
Summary
District staff presented K–8 assessment results showing sustained gains in ELA and math and narrowed gaps with state averages, while noting persistent achievement gaps for Black and Hispanic students and challenges in middle‑school math and grade‑7 ELA. Staff attributed progress to targeted professional development, instructional coaching and MTSS supports and pledged further disaggregated analysis.
District leaders told the Albany City School District Board on Nov. 6 that K–8 assessment results show multi‑year gains in both English language arts and math, progress toward closing gaps with New York State proficiency rates, and ongoing disparities among student subgroups.
Presenters said the district’s ELA proficiency improved by roughly 15 percentage points since 2018 and math proficiency by about 13 percentage points over the same period; they also highlighted cohort gains, for example a cohort rising from 29% to 46% proficiency in one exemplar. "We have reduced the gap between our proficiency and that of the state as a whole over time," a presenter said, adding that many grade levels now exceed pre‑pandemic proficiency.
The report included disaggregated results by race and ethnicity showing continued gaps: Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino and multiracial students “continue to fall behind” White students, the presentation said. Staff stressed the district’s equity goals and described steps to continue accelerating growth: strengthening tier‑1 instructional practices, deepening professional development for teachers and coaches, and implementing MTSS (multi‑tiered system of supports) to address disproportionality in growth.
Board members raised questions about whether gains were driven by the move to computer‑based testing or standards changes and whether test content has cultural‑competency issues that could affect subgroup performance; presenters attributed gains primarily to targeted instructional work rather than the testing format and referenced long‑standing research about background knowledge and reading comprehension. Members also queried an anomalous cohort pattern in early grades and asked for further cohort‑level analysis and subgroup comparisons to state benchmarks.
Staff outlined next steps: deeper disaggregation of data (including subgroup comparisons to state figures), continued focus on elementary foundational math and literacy, and targeted work on the academic transition to middle school to address dips in math and grade‑7 ELA performance. Presenters said they would return with additional analysis and a plan for interventions where needed.
What happens next: District staff will provide more disaggregated subgroup analysis, investigate cohort anomalies, and supply follow‑up recommendations for addressing middle‑school math and grade‑7 ELA dips.
