Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pilot Program Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Unidentified member moves to authorize pilot spending pending contract; board requests quarterly reports
Summary
Board members discussed funding options for a proposed pilot program with preliminary cost estimates and agreed to authorize spending pending a formal contract; quarterly reporting and an audit were requested. Specific dollar figures were discussed but some units were not specified in the transcript.
Get email alerts on the Pilot Program Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Speaker 2 said the project’s preliminary cost estimate was "roughly 30,000." Speaker 2 added that no grant matches had surfaced and suggested the best option would likely be to fund the item from a grant-match account if a match emerges. "That'd be about 61,000 away from that $2.50," Speaker 2 said (as recorded in the transcript).
Speaker 2 said staff could draft a resolution to move the money to a professional services line and suggested the sheriff’s office could pay for the contract so the county could "run the pilot program this year." Speaker 2 said, "If we need a line item for the rest of the county, then, we could just add it either in Matthew's budget or put it in county operations next year during the budget process." Speaker 1 asked that the board receive a report at least every quarter and that the vendor provide an audit so the board can review where and how funds were used.
Speaker 3 proposed an alternative funding source, asking whether the litigation fund or the grant-match account would be more appropriate. Speaker 2 said the accounting entry is primarily to dedicate money formally so it "doesn't get blurred" and that the board could take the funds from either source.
After discussion, Speaker 3 moved to "approve up to that $35 pending that we get" (transcript wording). Speaker 1 said there was a motion, called for a voice vote and recorded "Aye." The transcript records the motion and an affirmative voice vote but does not specify whether the '$35' is $35, $35,000 or another unit, nor does it record a roll-call tally of individual members.
What happens next: staff indicated they would provide a contract or quote for signature and, if approved, the board would sign the agreement once the contract becomes official. The board requested at least quarterly progress reports and an audit of expenditures.
Clarifying notes: the transcript contains several numeric references (roughly 30,000; about 61,000; a reference to $189,000) and a motion referencing "$35"; the units for the last figure are not specified in the transcript. The article preserves the wording as spoken and notes where numeric units are unclear.

