Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Baltimore County commission approves reduced garage height in Corbett Village after two years of dispute
Summary
After two years of reviews and public testimony, the Landmarks Preservation Commission approved Option A for a detached garage at 16223 Corbett Village Lane, describing it as the least visually intrusive design while urging better plan clarity and screening.
The Baltimore County Landmarks Preservation Commission on a unanimous roll-call approved a revised design for a detached garage at 16223 Corbett Village Lane in the Corbett Village Historic District, choosing the commission's Option A and issuing a certificate of appropriateness.
The commission heard hours of testimony after staff recalled that the owners had previously presented plans the commission had denied for excessive height. Christina Altman, a Corbett Village resident, told commissioners, "In 10 days, it will be 2 years since Costa's illegal construction was revealed," and urged stronger enforcement rather than gradual mitigation. Andrew Clemens, another neighbor, said the latest plans "meet most of the county requirements" and described Option A as "the least visually and aesthetically offensive." The property owners thanked staff and said they were hopeful the meeting would end the multi-year review.
Staff summarized three roof options for the garage and recommended the gable-style Option A, with a top plate at 9 feet 5 inches, as most compatible with district guidelines. Commissioners pressed the owners to provide an example property (address given as 1732 Corbett Road) and to ensure submitted drawings match the built condition and the promised landscaping screening. Staff noted that screening measures such as shrub planting are not enforceable by the commission and thus do not substitute for design compliance.
After discussion, a commissioner moved to approve Option A and to issue a certificate of appropriateness; the motion passed on a roll-call vote with commissioners recording affirmative votes and a noted chat entry from one member. The commission said it expects the applicants to follow up with clarified material choices and accurate plans so the approved design matches what is constructed on site.
The commission closed the item by encouraging the owners to submit consistent, annotated plans and to coordinate with staff on material selections. No further procedural steps were recorded for appeals or enforcement in the meeting minutes.
