Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bond Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bond program update: district recommends contingency transfers to finish seismic and deferred-maintenance work
Summary
Facilities staff told trustees the bond program is on track overall but recommended reallocating contingency to higher-risk seismic upgrades, deferred maintenance and a gym/cafeteria at Barnes Elementary; current program contingency sits at about $55 million against an $800M+ program.
Get email alerts on the Bond Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Facilities staff told the board that the district’s bond program — a slate of seismic upgrades, deferred-maintenance projects and school improvements — is generally on track but requires contingency transfers to complete several higher-cost projects.
Aaron Boyle, administrator for facilities development, said the total bond program is slightly over $800 million with a current program contingency of $55 million and roughly $223 million uncommitted (which includes the contingency). About half the bond program has been paid out and a substantial portion is under contract, lowering overrun risk for committed projects.
Boyle identified three higher-risk buckets where additional contingency is recommended: the middle-school seismic upgrades (six schools originally budgeted at roughly $6.6 million each but now more costly when roofs, HVAC and other systems are addressed), deferred maintenance (the bond included $120 million for deferred maintenance but demand is high), and the gym/cafeteria project at Barnes Elementary (initially budgeted at $7.5 million, now judged insufficient based on comparable projects).
He described examples and offered a risk analysis: some seismic sites required full roof replacements and major systems work that increased scope and cost beyond original estimates; deferred-maintenance needs (roofs, HVAC, paging) remain substantial; some projects returned under budget (Stoller), others may provide savings. Boyle noted reimbursements from state programs and utility/efficiency rebates plus interest earnings and some project underruns that are expected to replenish contingency over time.
Board members asked clarifying questions about the contingency use, how uncommitted balances will be prioritized, and whether the district might later add new projects once committed work is complete. Boyle said the plan is to apply contingency to complete promised projects and that projected reimbursements and interest earnings should continue to help the program.
Trustees did not approve new projects at the meeting; staff said they will return with recommended transfers and more detail to finalize how to allocate contingency to the seismic, deferred-maintenance and Barnes Elementary projects.

