Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Math Intervention topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears district math shortfalls; administrators plan tutoring, SuccessMaker and cross-site coaching

Coos Bay SD 9 Board of Directors · October 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Multiple presenters told the board that math proficiency is lower than desired across several schools; the district outlined interventions including targeted SuccessMaker time, tutoring, PLC-based data cycles and teacher cross-observations to spread best practice.

Administrators and building principals told the Coos Bay SD 9 board that math performance remains a district weakness and outlined an early-year plan to accelerate student gains.

Presenters said beginning-of-year diagnostics show substantial shares of students below grade-level math benchmarks in several buildings. Speaker 7 and Speaker 10 (building leaders) described a mix of causes — summer learning loss, uneven prior curricula and implementation-year challenges with newly adopted approaches — and proposed a few near-term responses: required SuccessMaker minutes (example targets cited: 60–700 minutes for some groups and 60 minutes/week for others), fact-fluency practice, before- and after-school tutoring, and PLC-driven common formative assessments to guide interventions.

Sunset and Milcoma presenters (Speaker 10 and Speaker 6) described plans to observe stronger classrooms at neighboring schools, to adopt short, high-frequency practice (fact fluency) and to combine small-group intervention with fresh pacing in core lessons. Administrators also signaled a desire to drill deeper into root causes by surveying families about barriers to attendance and by tracking cohort progress across years rather than single-year snapshots.

Board members asked for evidence of what interventions have shown impact (requesting prior years' side-by-side comparisons), and for numbers behind the percentages presented. District staff agreed to return with disaggregated reports and with clear sprint goals tied to implementation metrics (minutes, correct items, and tutoring participation).