Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Graduation Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates D‑ minus threshold for core diploma as part of graduation policy readings
Summary
Director Anderson questioned whether a D‑ minus minimum for credit on a newly adopted core diploma sets expectations too low; administrators said the core diploma meets state minimums and recommended the board may set higher local thresholds, with staff asked to research options.
During first‑reading consideration of multiple board policy updates on Oct. 6, Director Anderson raised concerns that allowing a D‑ minus as the minimum grade to earn credit for a “core diploma” could lower expectations for students.
“I just feel like there should be a little more expectations than a d minus for that because we want our kids to go out in the world and we want them to succeed,” Director Anderson said, asking whether the standard is state‑driven or locally set.
Administrators responded that the core diploma aligns to the state’s minimum credit requirements and that the standard of learning within courses does not change; the local board retains authority to adopt a more rigorous grade threshold. One board member suggested the superintendent be directed to research what a more aggressive grading scale would look like and report back.
The board approved first readings of the 100‑series and the first half of the 200‑series policies, and advanced policy 505.05 (graduation requirements) on a first reading that adds language allowing either trimester or semester scheduling. Members asked for additional communication about how grading and standards are applied across buildings and for future work sessions to explore the issue further.
