Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Office For Aging topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chautauqua County accepts $651,045 state grant for aging services; transportation debate centers on ‘mission creep’
Summary
The legislature approved a $651,045 New York State unmet-needs allocation for the Office for Aging to maintain meals and other services and consider transportation pilots; legislators pressed staff to avoid starting ongoing programs funded only by a temporary allocation.
The Chautauqua County Audit & Control Committee voted to accept a $651,045 supplemental allocation from New York State intended to prevent service cutbacks for the county’s older residents, including keeping home-delivered meals and congregate sites from being placed on a wait list.
Steve Bando, grant coordinator for the Office for Aging Services, told the committee the funds could be used to sustain current services and to cover gaps created by federal funding reductions. He listed possible uses including home-delivered meals, residential heating repairs and home modifications, and transportation options for clients who otherwise have difficulty traveling to appointments or returning from hospital trips.
"The total amount of the supplemental allocation is $651,045," Bando said. "It's gonna be very helpful for us to maintain providing the current services that we have." He added that staff were discussing transportation options and the potential to contract for services rather than operate county vehicles directly.
County Executive PJ Windle identified an operating model known as Go Go Grandparents as one example county staff were considering for transportation services. "The name of the program is called Go Go Grandparents," Windle said, describing it as a vetted driving service tailored for older adults.
Several legislators urged caution about launching new, ongoing services with one-time funds. One legislator warned, "That's what's called mission creep," arguing the county should not create recurring obligations unless the legislature approves ongoing funding. Bando and other staff responded that the Office for Aging would plan for ongoing costs, look for lower‑cost startup options (including used vehicles) and contract for driver services where appropriate; they emphasized that any permanent expansion would be budgeted in future cycles only after legislative review.
The committee approved acceptance of the grant by voice vote and directed Office for Aging staff to produce a plan, including a budget-impact analysis, before committing funds to a new service model. Staff said the initial transportation work would focus on planning and pilot options to avoid unfunded long-term obligations.
