Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chase County employee asks for pay adjustment; commissioners agree to revisit during regular salary review
Summary
A newly hired director asked the Chase County commissioners to adjust her starting pay, citing extra duties and handbook language. Commissioners said regular salary reviews occur in December/January and agreed to reconsider the request then; no immediate pay change was approved.
An employee serving in a newly created director role asked the Chase County Board of Commissioners on Oct. 13 to revisit the starting pay agreed when she was hired, saying the posted starting rate was $47.05 and that she asked the board for a 10% adjustment citing additional duties and prior experience.
The employee (identified in the transcript only as speaker S4) told commissioners she manages household hazardous waste (HHW) duties, maintains applicator licenses, attends certifications and conferences, and performs administrative tasks she said were not typical for similar positions. She said that, given those responsibilities, she was seeking a pay adjustment and had expected a conversation after a six‑month probationary period.
County counsel (identified in the transcript as S5) and commissioners stressed that regular, countywide salary reviews are handled in December and become effective in January. Counsel advised that if a negotiated exception to handbook pay‑scale rules existed at hire, it should have been documented at that time and recommended staff review onboarding records and meeting minutes to clarify what was promised. Commissioners said they were willing to consider a request but that, absent documented exceptional terms, the standard review schedule should apply.
Chair (speaker S1) and other commissioners repeatedly said the board would take the employee’s case under advisement and asked that the employee present documentation and arguments at the December agenda or the standard January salary review. The conversation included disagreement about whether duties had been added after hiring or whether the scope was outlined when the job was created; commissioners concluded the appropriate next step is a formal review during the regular review window rather than an immediate adjustment.
No formal motion to change pay was made or approved at the meeting. Commissioners encouraged the employee to assemble any relevant documentation and return in December for formal consideration during the departmental salary review process.
The board’s public record does not show an immediate change; the directive recorded in open session was to revisit the matter at the standard end‑of‑year review.
