Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tif topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bend staff details site‑specific tax‑increment assistance; committee weighs benefits and limits
Summary
Staff explained Bend’s newly adopted site‑specific tax‑increment assistance policy (a TIF rebate tied to new assessed value) and reviewed early projects including Bridal Ridge; committee members raised concerns about upfront capacity, benefits for small infill projects, and enforcement of affordability through development agreements.
Jonathan Taylor, urban renewal project manager, presented Bend’s site‑specific tax‑increment assistance policy and how tax increment financing (TIF) can be used to incentivize new housing. He explained that TIF freezes the current assessed value and directs future tax increment from new development back to the project as annual rebates or to cover system development charges (SDCs) and infrastructure. Jonathan said the policy requires a base minimum of 15% of units rented at or below 90% AMI for the rebate program (with limits on annual rent increases) and that council gave staff discretion to extend rebates up to 30 years for projects that deliver additional community benefits (energy certifications, local contractor utilization, higher affordability percentages).
Jonathan reviewed recent site‑specific uses of the policy: Bridal Ridge (first project under construction) committed 20% of units at 80–90% AMI, elected to channel part of the rebate to SDC coverage and to prioritize local contractors. For Bridal Ridge staff reported an existing assessed value of roughly $269,000 and an estimated first‑year rebate of about $291,000; total rebate in the project’s draft plan is approximately $14.2 million over its 30‑year plan link. Staff emphasized these figures use assessor‑determined R‑MV (real market value) not total development cost.
Committee members asked whether the rebate can be used for upfront funding (bonding vs rebate): staff said a jurisdiction could bond and provide upfront funding but the city elected not to bond in the current round because that would create immediate debt exposure; instead staff prioritized annual rebates and SDC coverage options. Members also asked about thresholds for small infill projects; staff said TIF is most effective on vacant or underutilized parcels and typically becomes materially helpful at four units or more because of assessment categorizations and the way the tax assessor calculates change in value.
Staff noted compliance is managed through development agreements recorded on title and that rebate eligibility requires annual certification of compliance; if a project defaults or fails to certify it may forfeit the rebate and face contractual clawbacks.
