Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parking Requirements topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission debates strip-mall parking rules and shared-parking options after tenant seeks space at Brandon 90 Plaza

Planning and Zoning Commission · November 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A developer representative said existing parking on a strip-mall site would be insufficient for an additional restaurant under current standards; commissioners discussed applying a 1-per-200-sq-ft strip-mall standard (Sioux Falls example), use-based recalculation at building-permit time and shared-parking conditional-use options.

At the meeting a construction representative, Leroy Aske, told the Planning and Zoning Commission his client’s strip mall (1313–1321 E. Ash Place, the Jimmy John’s building) faces parking shortfalls if a restaurant tenant occupies a vacant unit under current city parking standards. Staff said Brandon typically uses a retail standard of 1 parking stall per 300 square feet and an eating-and-drinking standard of 1 per 100 square feet (or seat-based), which can produce dramatically different requirements depending on the tenant. Aske said Jimmy John’s occupies about 1,500 square feet and the prospective tenant would be about 2,600 square feet; under a stricter restaurant standard they would not have sufficient on-site stalls. Staff described how Sioux Falls applies an intermediate 1-per-200 standard for strip malls at the building phase to avoid re-evaluating tenant changes each time. Commissioners discussed several options: (1) apply a 1-per-200 strip-mall standard on initial building permit and only revisit if the building is substantially altered; (2) continue applying standards at each change-of-use/building-permit if the use type changes materially; and (3) allow shared parking through a conditional-use permitting process when peak hours do not overlap. Commissioners asked staff to prepare draft language (including a potential classification that differentiates high- and low-density eating/drinking establishments by percent of floor area dedicated to seating) and return the item to a future agenda; staff estimated drafting an amendment would take roughly 60–90 days. Leroy Aske said he would seek tenant commitments and may pursue a building permit, a conditional-use path or acquiring adjacent land depending on cost and timing.