Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves reduced impervious-surface variance for Windward Pass property

Fishers Board of Zoning Appeals · November 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Fishers Board of Zoning Appeals granted a variance for 10234 Windward Pass to increase impervious cover, approving 50% coverage (the petitioner had sought 54%) for a garage addition and pool deck in an R-3 district. The vote passed with one dissent.

The Fishers Board of Zoning Appeals on Nov. 19 approved a variance allowing increased impervious surface at 10234 Windward Pass, but limited the coverage to 50% rather than the 54% requested by petitioner Greg Looney.

The variance (VA-25-17) sought relief from sections 3.2 0.4 b 5 b of the city's unified development ordinance to permit a garage addition and a pool with surrounding deck that would raise the lot's impervious surface above the standard 40% allowed in an R-3 district. Looney appeared before the board and the staff presentation proceeded; no members of the public spoke during the public hearing.

An unidentified board member moved to approve VA-25-17 with an amendment capping impervious surface at 50%. The motion received a second and the board conducted a roll-call vote. The motion passed with four votes in favor and one opposing vote recorded by Mister Ferrucci.

After the vote, the chair told the petitioner: "Your petition has been approved but not 54% at 50%." The approval carries the board-imposed condition limiting impervious coverage to 50% for the proposed garage and pool/deck construction.

The approval is recorded as a variance under case VA-25-17; the board did not note any additional conditions beyond the reduced impervious-surface limit. The item was introduced under the city's unified development ordinance referencing the specific variance sections listed during the meeting.