Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves revised engineer estimate and awards salt-storage site work to local contractor
Summary
Council accepted a revised city engineer estimate and awarded a $179,015 contract to PSE/PSC Contractors for salt-storage building site preparation, citing higher concrete costs and a compressed timeline; staff said project funding was transferred from the electric utility.
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Augusta City Council approved two linked actions to advance construction of a salt storage building at the Public Works campus: (1) acceptance of a revised city engineer’s bid estimate and (2) award of a construction contract to PSE/PSC Contractors for site development.
Public Works staff explained that bids opened Sept. 30 produced one qualified bid from PSE Contractors that exceeded the original engineer’s estimate by roughly $19,847. Staff said the primary driver of the difference was concrete costs for exterior pads and foundation work: 'Almost all of it was in the concrete,' the project lead said (SEG 1297–1298). The city engineer revised the estimate upward (from about $159,168 to about $184,467) so the contract could be awarded in compliance with state law governing cities of the second class.
Council approved the revised estimate and then voted to award a $179,015 contract to PSC/PSE Contractors LLC to handle site preparation, drainage, grading and concrete pad construction. Staff said the total budget for the building, site work and engineering is $430,000 and that, after the award and estimated tariffs, projected expense is about $386,205 leaving a contingency of approximately $43,795. Funding was drawn via transfer from the electric utility and a later budget amendment will be required to square accounts.
Council discussed bidding outreach and the compressed timeline, with staff noting a broader advertising effort and the end-of-season construction schedule probably limited bidder interest. The motions to accept the revised estimate and to award the contract were approved by voice vote.

