Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Compliance Windows topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission conditions approval at 4636 Capel Circle after finding multiple unpermitted alterations

El Paso City Historic Landmark Commission · November 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a small rear addition at 4636 Capel Circle (Austin Terrace Historic District) but required historically accurate window replacements, reopening of infilled openings, correction of code violations within 90 days, and withholding permits until the property is compliant.

The El Paso City Historic Landmark Commission approved a certificate of appropriateness for a small addition at 4636 Capel Circle while requiring the owner to bring the property into compliance before permits are issued.

Staff reported that multiple unpermitted changes were discovered during review: many original windows were removed or replaced with sliders, several window openings were infilled, and some interior work appears to have been done without permits. Preservation staff told the commission, “Work was done illegally. We know this for certain,” and recommended that no permits be issued until the violations are corrected, that infilled openings be reopened and fitted with historically appropriate windows, and that accurate drawings be submitted prior to permitting.

Commissioners raised questions about whether required repairs could create a financial burden for the owner and whether removing windows might have affected bedroom egress or other building‑code items. A commissioner warned the owner that pursuing full compliance could be costly but necessary. The commission also discussed the draft ADU ordinance and clarified that, even if an ADU ordinance passes, properties within historic districts would still require design review.

Luis Salcedo, the applicant’s building designer, spoke for the owner and said the side windows had been closed to gain usable counter and furniture space and to improve privacy; he urged that the front windows be handled to preserve functionality while meeting historic patterns. Salcedo also advised the owner to consider shorter or altered windows or faux windows where appropriate.

After discussion the commission approved staff’s recommendations: replace windows with historically accurate units, reopen and restore infilled openings, correct violations within 90 days, and submit accurate elevation and plan drawings before permits will be issued. The commission stressed that window permits are required and that unresolved violations can encourage similar work on neighboring properties.