Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends denial of proposed short‑term rental zoning amendment
Summary
The City of Columbia Planning Commission voted 5–3 to recommend denial of a staff‑prepared amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance that would add short‑term rentals as a principal, regulated use and restrict residential STRs to parcels fronting four‑lane collectors or arterials. Commissioners and public commenters debated enforcement, neighborhood impacts and stakeholder outreach.
The City of Columbia Planning Commission on Nov. 13 recommended denial of a proposed amendment to Chapter 17, Article 4 of the Unified Development Ordinance that would have added short‑term rentals (STRs) as a regulated principal use and imposed location and operational limits.
Staff said the amendment would permit STRs in mixed‑use and commercial districts and allow them as conditional uses in residential districts only if the parcel fronts a four‑lane collector or arterial road. Staff also told the commission that legally permitted STRs already in the city would be treated as nonconforming uses and could continue.
David Bergman, a Columbia property manager who said his company employs about 25 people and manages roughly 90 permitted units, told the commission the maps and standards were released with little opportunity for stakeholder review. “The maps and standards were released yesterday,” Bergman said, arguing the four‑lane frontage requirement would exclude most residential STRs and effectively “ban our business.” He urged the commission to defer the amendment for more engagement.
Other operators and managers echoed Bergman’s concerns about notice and enforcement. Joseph Guido and Kim Franklin said the city already has a registration and point‑based enforcement system enforced by code enforcement and the police, and they urged stricter enforcement rather than restricting where STRs can operate.
Neighborhood representatives and historic‑district leaders urged the opposite approach. John Wilkinson, president of the Elmwood Park Neighborhood Association, said his group’s survey showed strong support for the amendment and warned that STRs can convert residential blocks into hotel‑style uses; Wilkinson said his association had experienced safety and quality‑of‑life problems tied to STRs. Denise Wellman, president of a historic district, said zoning changes are needed to preserve family residential areas and protect historic assets.
Staff estimated approximately 426 permitted STRs in Columbia; one manager said only about five of his 90 units would qualify under the proposed four‑lane rule. Commissioners debated whether to defer the item to a workshop or recommend modifications, noting City Council’s public hearing was scheduled for Dec. 16 and the planning commission’s next meeting was Dec. 11.
A motion to recommend denial of the amendment passed on a roll call vote: Brabham (Aye), Causey (Aye), Cook (Yes), Coveney (No), Foster (Aye), Holcomb (Aye), Osorio (No) and Cohn (No), with a 5–3 margin in favor of recommending denial. The recommendation will be transmitted to City Council, which will hold the public hearing and make the final decision.
If Council pursues changes, staff and commissioners said they could propose alternate text or a workshop to gather more stakeholder input before Council’s hearing. The planning commission noted existing STRs would remain nonconforming under the draft language and that any final council action could include different limits or enforcement measures.
