Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Harlingen residents press city commissioners to halt Horseshoe Point subdivision variance over single-access, drainage and safety concerns
Summary
Neighbors voiced strong opposition to a variance that would allow the Horseshoe Point subdivision to use one entrance instead of two, citing traffic, emergency access and drainage problems for roughly 390 homes; commissioners left the item tabled and directed staff to consider a public workshop and traffic study.
Residents from neighborhoods near Morris Road pressed the Harlingen City Commission to delay action on a proposed variance that would allow the Horseshoe Point subdivision to proceed with a single entrance.
Kate Holt, who identified herself as a 20-year resident of Waters Edge, said neighbors were not notified and described the plan as incompatible with the area. "With lot sizes that small...this creates a safety issue for the residents and a serious challenge for emergency vehicles," she said, summarizing traffic and parking problems she said would follow if roughly 390 homes are built with frontages as small as 46 feet.
Several other speakers raised similar concerns about stormwater drainage and emergency access. Diana Padilla, a Morris Road resident, asked who would pay to expand Morris Road and urged the city to require retention ponds and other flood-control measures. "If this design for the subdivision happens and the ditch goes behind their home, it also goes behind our property and is going to take more land from our property," she said.
City commissioners heard repeated warnings that Morris Road is a two-lane residential street lacking sidewalks, lighting and markings, and that a single egress could increase response times for ambulances and fire trucks. Tom Hussian and other residents pointed to flooding during the March storms as evidence that drainage must be re‑examined before development moves forward.
Commissioners responded by declining to take the item off the table. Several members, noting the volume of public opposition, proposed scheduling a public workshop and asking staff to commission or present a traffic study and additional drainage analysis before any variance is approved. One commissioner withdrew a motion to remove the item from the table and the variance remained tabled for further study.
Next steps: the commission directed staff to examine traffic and drainage impacts and to explore a public workshop so residents can speak directly with staff, engineers and the developer before the commission considers the variance again.
