Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Twentynine Palms debates visitor center future as staff weighs relocation near Joshua Tree National Park
Loading...
Summary
Council heard five options for the visitor center — keep the current site, close it, move into a national‑park space (not allowed), place a Connex mobile unit at Freedom Plaza (cost est. $150,000–$250,000) or relocate to the Freedom Plaza gym lobby. Staff emphasized low current foot traffic (about 100/week) vs ~3,000/week at the national park center; council and stakeholders urged finding staffing solutions rather than closing.
City of Twentynine Palms officials spent an extended portion of their Nov. 11 meeting discussing whether to relocate or close the city’s visitor center and how to staff it. Staff presented five options: continue operations in the current building on Highway 62; close the visitor center; attempt to colocate within the Joshua Tree National Park visitor center (staff said that is not possible because the park facility is under a federal lease); install a Connex‑style mobile office at Freedom Plaza; or move operations into the Freedom Plaza gymnasium lobby.
Staff said the visitor center currently averages about 100 visitors per week, compared with about 3,000 visitors per week who go into the Joshua Tree National Park visitor center, a gap that prompted the proposal to test a closer, higher‑traffic location. The Connex option carried a staff estimate of roughly $150,000–$250,000 to purchase or rent a unit, run utilities and prepare the site. Staff and several councilmembers described the Connex option as a proof‑of‑concept to measure increased foot traffic before making larger capital commitments.
Many public speakers and stakeholders urged keeping the current facility open. Paul Razzo, representing local arts and business stakeholders, said the current location functions as a gallery space and marketing platform for local artists and argued against closing it. Susan Piplow and a representative of the Parks & Recreation department said the facility draws meaningful visitor and local use and that staffing—not location—was the primary problem. TBID staff confirmed the part‑time position that supported the center is currently vacant and described past efforts to fill the role and hybrid staffing models that were tried during the pandemic.
Council members generally expressed support for maintaining a visitor center but said staffing solutions should be prioritized. Several members suggested tabling the item while staff explores options to staff the existing site, seeks grant funds, or budgets for a trial Connex unit. No final decision to relocate or close the visitor center was made at the meeting.
Next steps: Council agreed to table the item for further exploration of staffing, funding and a possible short‑term pilot at Freedom Plaza.
