The Finance and Economic Development committee unanimously indicated support for a targeted street-lighting safety project on the Dussel–Ford corridor and sought direction on whether the city should pursue ownership of new poles or rely on existing utility-owned poles.

Speaker 4 said the intersection lighting proposal came from the police department citing safety and visibility concerns. Committee discussion focused on scope and ownership: Speaker 7 described repeated service and maintenance problems with Toledo Edison and said city-owned poles would allow the public-service department to directly manage maintenance, although upfront installation costs would be higher. "We have control over that. If the city owns the post, the public-service department has the ability to make sure that that doesn't happen to the ones that we own," Speaker 7 said.

Members also asked about dark-sky considerations and state spacing standards; staff noted state of Ohio standards guide pole spacing and illumination levels and emphasized the need to review accident data and pedestrian needs for final design. Some members asked staff to prepare a comparative estimate showing the lifetime cost difference between utility-owned and city-owned poles, and to propose a scope limited to the corridor where crash data show higher risk.

Next steps: staff will prepare cost comparisons, spacing and standard-compliance options and a recommended scope for a corridor lighting project for council review.