Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Outdoor Dining topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Laguna Beach council directs phased outdoor-dining plan and limits for street parklets
Summary
Council gave staff a three-part direction: (1) create a permanent administrative program for sidewalk dining that does not use public parking, extending existing temporary permits while the program is developed; (2) evaluate private‑parking outdoor-dining cases case‑by‑case and consider allowing code reductions (e.g., a five-space parking reduction) with fees or conditions; (3) require public-parking 'parklets' to submit transition plans and tighten maintenance and operational conditions, with a shorter transition timeline for street parklets.
Council considered an extensive staff presentation and public comment on the future of outdoor dining and parklets downtown as the city's temporary-use-permit (TUP) program nears a Jan. 1, 2026 sunset and state legislation has relaxed some parking restrictions. Jeremy (staff) summarized options including sunsetting the program, creating a permanent program, or a phased transition.
Staff noted a range of existing outdoor-dining formats: (A) sidewalk dining that does not remove parking, (B) private-property conversions that use private parking stalls, and (C) public on-street parklets that occupy public parking spaces. Councilors and members of the public debated equity between restaurants and daytime retailers, parking impacts (Las Brisas and other high-use locations were singled out), safety around certain parklets and delivery activity, and the aesthetic upkeep of existing parklets.
After extended debate, council provided direction in three buckets: 1) Outdoor dining that does not impact public or private parking: council directed staff to develop a permanent administrative program and to extend current TUPs while the program is created. 2) Private parking used for dining: council directed staff to evaluate each case individually, to allow use of existing code options (such as up-to-5-space reductions where appropriate) but to return with fee or in-lieu proposals and CUP amendments if needed, and to phase changes so businesses can adapt. 3) Public on-street parklets: council directed staff to renew existing on-street TUPs temporarily but require those businesses to submit transition plans to move dining onto sidewalks or to comply with new standards; staff was asked to require improved maintenance (no daytime storage), set clearer operating conditions, and require an earlier transition timeline (rough consensus for a six-month transition plan for on-street parklets or sooner if property-specific solutions are found).
Staff will return with a proposed permanent program for sidewalk dining, a case-by-case analysis and recommended fee/incubator approach for private‑space conversions, and a phased transition plan and operating standards for publicly occupied parklets. The council framed the approach as aimed at balancing downtown vitality with parking equity and accessibility.
