Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors, owners and planners debate whether painted wall is mural or sign as commission approves Syndicate Cycle signage
Summary
The commission approved new signage and a landmark‑modification permit for Syndicate Cycle at 730 Montgomery Street after discussion with the property owner over whether the painted wall was a mural or a wall sign and whether owners had been notified of landmark status.
Oroville — The Planning Commission approved signage and a landmark modification permit for Syndicate Cycle, and during the hearing a property owner said she was surprised to learn the building qualified under landmark criteria.
Staff said the proposal at 730 Montgomery Street includes rehabilitating a historic front sign, adding a new pole sign and a painted wall sign. Because the front sign reflects historic character, staff recommended processing the application as a landmark modification to ensure compatibility with the building’s historic features. Staff noted the painted wall was determined to be a wall sign rather than a mural under the zoning code definition but acknowledged the distinction required further clarity for owners.
Property owner Raquel Nolan said she and her husband own the building and were not notified that the property appeared on the city’s landmark list; she said notification would have affected tenant selection and renovation decisions. “I feel like I’m caught off guard,” Nolan said, asking when and who designated the building and why owners were not told.
Commissioners and staff agreed to post and update the landmark list on the city website and to improve owner notification procedures for future designations. Commissioners also discussed the code definition (17O406O) that distinguishes murals (art for decoration) from wall signs (business identifying text) and explained staff’s approach to walk both regulatory worlds where necessary.
Applicant Matthew described the sign dimensions and said he intended to rehabilitate the existing historic sign and cooperate with staff on any edits. After public comment and discussion, commissioners moved and approved the signage as presented; the clerk recorded the motion as passing with one commissioner absent.
What’s next: Staff will finalize the landmark modification permit and sign conditions; staff said they will post landmark lists and contact affected property owners to improve outreach and reduce future surprises for owners undertaking renovations.
