Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council delays overhaul of animal control rules after lengthy debate; vote to postpone to Nov. 4
Summary
After extended debate over provisions that would add a 'dangerous dog' division, change insurance and sterilization rules, limit pets per household and require inspections for multi-pet permits, the council postponed action to Nov. 4 to allow more review of enforcement and grandfathering issues.
Council considered a first-reading ordinance on Oct. 14 that would amend Chapter 4 of the city code to add a division on "dangerous dogs," align definitions with state law, raise dangerous-dog liability insurance requirements to $1,000,000, require multi-pet permits for households with more than four animals, create breeder permits, and change impoundment/sterilization rules.
Mayor Pro Tem and Animal Services Director Steven Green outlined the proposed changes and noted the city currently lists eight declared dangerous dogs. The proposed ordinance would extend the compliance window from 15 to 30 days, allow a 15-day appeal window, and require owners who fail to comply to surrender a declared dangerous dog to Lubbock Animal Services; municipal court could order euthanasia following subsequent dangerous attacks. The ordinance would also limit households to a combined total of four dogs and cats without a multi-pet permit, require a living-conditions inspection by Lubbock Animal Services before issuing multi-pet or breeder permits, and permit certain fee waivers tied to sterilization.
Several councilmembers raised enforcement and equity concerns. Councilmember David Glasheen said the provisions "are not going to meaningfully reduce the number of stray and loose dogs that we have on the street" and warned the ordinance risks "an offensive overreach of government authority" if the city requires routine home inspections. Others pressed for clearer grandfathering rules for residents who already keep multiple pets and for staffing and cost estimates to perform the proposed inspections. Doctor Wilson and Mayor Pro Tem supported the need to take steps to address loose and dangerous dogs but agreed more work was needed on implementation language.
Faced with those concerns and time constraints, the council first voted to postpone further action to Oct. 28. After moving to executive session on unrelated matters and returning to open session, Councilmember Glasheen moved to postpone item 6.6 to Nov. 4; the motion carried. The council also authorized release of the Lubbock facility needs assessment prepared by Lubbock Experience, Inc., and adjourned.
