Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kuna council approves Madrone Village annexation despite traffic and school-capacity concerns
Summary
The Kuna City Council approved annexation and a preliminary plat for the Madrone Village development, authorizing roughly 79 acres to be annexed and subdivided into 354 buildable single-family lots plus donated parcels for a school, park and future fire station. Councilors debated traffic impacts, school capacity and utility costs before voting to approve with conditions.
The Kuna City Council voted to approve case numbers 2408AN and 2405S, authorizing annexation of about 79 acres and a preliminary plat for the Madrone Village development, which will include 354 buildable single-family lots, seven commercial lots and dedicated lots for a school, a city park and a future fire station. The council approved the application following staff recommendations and conditions listed in the packet.
Senior planner Troy Beheunin told the council staff had reviewed the proposal for consistency with Kuna city code, Idaho state statutes and the Kuna Comprehensive Plan and recommended conditional approval. Applicant representatives said they reduced density from an earlier 432-unit plan and now propose 354 residential lots, 11.7 acres of open space (exceeding the 8.29-acre code minimum) and several public-benefit dedications, including a donated site for a SAGE International charter school and a two-acre parcel reserved for Fire Station No. 2.
Stephanie Hopkins of Kaim Engineering said the developer will construct half-street improvements on Kuna Road, a new Bead Lily Avenue collector, and Sunbeam collector in phases. Traffic consultant Jamie Markosian said the revised plan generates fewer trips than the earlier, denser proposal and that ACHD accepted the traffic-impact study; he noted a required reanalysis at the 200th lot for the Black Cat and Columbia Road intersection and that additional mitigations could be required later.
School and public-safety impacts were central to council debate. Tim Jensen of the Kuna School District said Kuna High School is operating at roughly 110% capacity and other feeder schools are near capacity; he said the district and developer had not reached a mitigation agreement and asked the council to require a district capacity plan (temporary classrooms, buses, staffing) if the annexation moved forward. Developers and charter-school representatives said the donated charter school would be funded without local tax levies and could add student capacity; Bloom/SAGE representatives said SAGE schools rely on state funding, philanthropy and private financing and aim to serve diverse populations.
Contractor and public-works testimony highlighted utility constraints for the donated fire-station lot. Scott Hedrick explained the nearest sewer connection sits about 880 feet away in deep basalt and that extending sewer and other utilities could require extensive trenching and increased construction costs; he said the developer’s phasing plan would bring utilities to the station site and enable construction.
Applicant Tim Mack and the development team said they would front-load amenities: the conceptual first phase includes 66 residential lots plus the commercial lots, the park, the school lot and the fire-station lot, and the team committed to fast-tracking design and submitting construction documents if the annexation were approved. Transcript discussion records an applicant estimate of roughly $2,000,000 in off-site utility work to serve the fire-station parcel.
A final motion to approve the annexation and preliminary plat with conditions passed after deliberation. The transcript records Council President Bruce as voting 'No', Council member Leroy and Council member McPherson as voting 'Yes', and Council member Biggs stating an intent to recuse earlier in deliberations. The mayor announced "That motion carries." The approval moves the project into the next stages of platting and permitting under the conditions outlined in staff materials.
The council’s decision included multiple conditions listed in the staff packet that applicants must meet as part of subsequent plat and infrastructure approvals; ACHD and other agencies retain the authority to require additional mitigation or separate traffic studies for the school site and other project phases.
What happens next: the applicant said it would begin construction drawings immediately and anticipated starting work on the first phase after required reviews. ACHD-required reanalysis at the project’s 200th lot and a separate TIS and CUP for the school site were noted as future procedural steps that could trigger additional mitigation requirements.
