Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annexation Mcguire topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Post Falls planning panel recommends R2 zoning for McGuire annexation with single‑family restriction

Post Falls Planning and Zoning Commission · November 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Post Falls Planning & Zoning Commission voted to recommend R2 zoning for the 18.11‑acre McGuire Annexation (ANNX‑25‑4) but asked that the annexation agreement limit development to detached single‑family homes; the recommendation now moves to City Council.

Post Falls’ Planning & Zoning Commission recommended R2 (medium‑density residential) zoning for the McGuire Annexation (ANNX‑25‑4) on Nov. 12, forwarding the recommendation to City Council with a directive that an annexation agreement restrict development to detached single‑family homes.

Justin Souder, planning staff, told commissioners the 18.11‑acre site at McGuire Road and Pole Line Avenue is designated “transitional” in the Post Falls Comprehensive Plan and lies in a commercial activity node adjacent to arterial streets. Souder said the city can serve wastewater and that the East Green Acres Irrigation District supplies water. He said access and right‑of‑way issues raised by the Post Falls Highway District would be addressed at subdivision.

Ray Kimball, an engineer for the applicants with Whipple Consulting Engineers, said the four parcels were assembled to allow coordinated improvements. “This is an R2 request for single‑family residential, not apartments, not duplexes,” Kimball said, adding the applicants intend detached single‑family homes and will dedicate right‑of‑way and build frontage improvements. Kimball said the developer‑funded improvements give the city “a quarter mile of pedestrian pathway” and estimated present‑day frontage/right‑of‑way value at about $681,000.

Supporters told the commission the proposal would add attainable housing and city‑paid infrastructure benefits. John Rudebaugh, a local resident, said the project would help create housing options for younger families. Amy Gilmore, a neighbor, said new sidewalks would make it safer for children to walk to school.

Opponents argued the requested R2 zoning is incompatible with the surrounding large‑lot, single‑family neighborhood and raised concerns about traffic and emergency access where trains can block local crossings. Mary Lee Owen, a bordering neighbor, said the staff report’s acknowledgement that infrastructure to support urban development is “mostly not in place at this time” undercut the case for immediate R2 rezoning. Neighbor Gerald Dale told commissioners he canvassed nearby residents and reported broad opposition.

Commissioners framed the action narrowly: they evaluated the three review criteria (consistency with the future land use map, alignment with comprehensive‑plan goals, and demonstrable adverse impacts on service delivery). Several members said transitional areas are ambiguous but concluded R2 is an implementing zone for the mapped designation and that no demonstrable adverse impacts on public services were identified in the agency comments. Commissioner discussion also emphasized that any restriction on housing type should be included in the annexation agreement so City Council can review enforceable terms.

A motion to recommend approval of R2 zoning for ANNX‑25‑4, along with the recommendation to limit development to detached single‑family housing, carried on a roll‑call vote. The commission’s recommendation will be transmitted to City Council for final consideration.

What happens next: City staff will draft the annexation agreement and a zoning recommendation for Council review. The Council will decide whether to accept the annexation and adopt the zoning and any development restrictions.