Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ridgecrest council introduces ordinance to restrict dangerous fireworks after public debate over social‑host penalties
Summary
Council introduced, by title only, an ordinance to ban dangerous fireworks and to allow social‑host liability for property owners in certain circumstances; council heard extensive public comment about enforcement, probable‑cause standards, landlord exposure and fines.
The Ridgecrest City Council voted 5‑0 on Oct. 1 to introduce an ordinance amending Article 3 of the Ridgecrest Municipal Code to prohibit "dangerous fireworks" as defined by state law and to create social‑host provisions that could hold property owners or hosts responsible when dangerous fireworks are discharged from or adjacent to their property.
City Attorney staff and the Police Chief explained the ordinance excludes "safe and sane" consumer fireworks sold at permitted booths and aims to reduce fire risk and related calls for service. The chief outlined enforcement mechanics: officers must develop probable cause and typically will try to identify the person launching fireworks and address that person under the Health and Safety Code; the social‑host language is intended to deter parties where people launch aerial fireworks and then return to a private gathering.
Councilmembers and members of the public raised concerns about the scope of potential liability for property owners and landlords, how probable cause would be established in cul‑de‑sac or street‑launched cases, and the size of administrative fines. The chief described standard practice and rebuttal rights: owners or recipients of an administrative citation would have an opportunity to rebut the presumption at a hearing; the ordinance contemplates municipal administrative citations (example amounts were discussed during Q&A; staff cited typical local fines and compared them to Kern County penalties).
Multiple residents urged caution with broad language that could create unintended exposure for landlords or people whose property is adjacent to a street where fireworks are launched. Police and legal staff said they would rely on observation and investigation; if probable cause is absent, social‑host provisions would not be the basis for an administrative citation. The first reading was introduced by title only; staff said the second reading and adoption are scheduled for the Nov. 5 council meeting.
