Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident flags inconsistency in draft public‑comment rules; council to review council rules
Summary
A Yamhill resident asked council to resolve an apparent conflict in draft Rules of Procedure that requires materials be submitted seven days before a meeting while the packet is distributed three days before; council characterized the rules as draft and said staff will review and likely return with clarifying language.
Yamhill — Robert (Bob) Davis of North Maple Street told the City Council on Nov. 12 he was concerned that the draft Rules of Procedure require speakers to provide materials to the city recorder at least seven days before a meeting while the council packet is published three days before the meeting, a combination he described as a "catch‑22" for residents who want to comment on agenda items and bring handouts.
Davis read the draft language aloud and asked how a public commenter could meet a seven‑day deadline if the packet and agenda are issued three days before the meeting. Mayor Ed Corrigan responded that the seven‑day requirement applies to materials intended to be handed out during a presentation (including materials from council members) and that tonight’s items were for discussion, not final adoption. Corrigan thanked Davis for raising the issue and said staff would give it attention.
Separately, councilors asked clarifying questions about a conflict‑of‑interest clause in the proposed council rules (page 18) that appears to allow a conflicted member to abstain from discussion but still vote if their vote is needed to meet a minimum number of votes; staff explained such situations would be rare and recommended consulting legal counsel or the Oregon Government Ethics Commission for advice in specific cases. Council also noted the municipal charter requires council rules be adopted by resolution, whereas the existing language is currently in ordinance form; staff outlined next steps to repeal the ordinance language and adopt rules by resolution after appropriate notice.
What this means: Council acknowledged procedural ambiguities in the draft rules and set a path to review and clarify language, including seeking legal guidance when conflict‑of‑interest situations arise.
Next steps: Staff will review the seven‑day materials requirement and the conflict‑of‑interest language and return with clarified language or a proposal for a work session.
Sources: Public comment and council discussion, Nov. 12 Yamhill City Council meeting.
