Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning And Code topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Building inspector, council discuss chickens and zoning after resident complaints; Supreme Court precedent cited

Village of Saint Charles Council · November 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The village building inspector reported permit activity and code enforcement work and, while discussing a resident complaint about keeping meat chickens, noted a Michigan Supreme Court decision (Northville Township v. Northville Public Schools) that public schools are not subject to local zoning; council asked staff to research how that precedent applies to homeschool settings.

The building inspector and council reviewed ongoing permit activity and civil infraction referrals. Council members raised a resident complaint about keeping chickens. The inspector said some chicken complaints had been resolved and that in some cases chickens used in school programs are temporary (meat birds) and not long-term backyard flocks.

During the discussion, the inspector cited a Michigan Supreme Court decision as precedent that public schools, under the jurisdiction of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, are not subject to local zoning controls. The inspector said he looked up the case (Northville Township v. Northville Public Schools) and that it had reached the state Supreme Court; he noted the case’s opinion author (Justice Robert P. Young Jr.) when explaining why local zoning cannot be used to restrict school property activities.

Council members asked staff to clarify how the precedent applies to other education situations such as homeschooling or shared programs and whether local code can regulate non-school residents keeping chickens. The inspector said he would look for the specific legal opinion and provide clarification in a follow-up.