Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County defers CHAP hunting‑access contract while hunting rights and liability are clarified
Summary
After extended discussion with park representatives and a private‑lands biologist, commissioners agreed to delay signing a five‑year CHAP hunting/access contract until lease language and hunting‑rights assignments (and liability flows) are clarified with the park board and the current land operator.
Get email alerts on the Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Clay County Commission paused action on a proposed five‑year CHAP (controlled hunting/access program) contract after an extended discussion about who should sign the agreement and whether hunting rights are already granted under an existing lease.
Todd Conover, a private‑lands biologist invited to the meeting, and Tony Keller, a park board representative, joined commissioners to explain the CHAP program’s flexibility and safeguards. Commissioners and park representatives debated whether the Clay County Park Board had authority under the current lease to manage hunting and whether the CHAP contract would shift liability to the state.
"The liability goes to the state," one participant said during the discussion, explaining how the CHAP structure assigns liability in certain circumstances; commissioners asked staff to confirm the exact legal flow of indemnification. Commissioners also discussed the practical management details the CHAP contract would allow — for example, limiting the number of tree stands, labeling stands and requiring pop‑up blinds be removed nightly — and noted that such controls were a reason they considered the program an opportunity to regulate and improve longstanding hunting use on the site.
Because a number of details were ambiguous in the county’s existing park lease (particularly whether hunting rights were explicitly conveyed), the board asked that the park board work through the specifics with the current land operator and return with clarified lease language or a contractual line to make hunting rights explicit. The commission agreed to delay signing the CHAP contract until next week to ensure the park board and county have consistent, documented authority and liability protections in place.
Next step: staff will confirm whether the current lease conveys hunting rights to the park board, obtain any written confirmation from the land operator and, if necessary, add explicit hunting‑rights language to the CHAP contract before bringing a finalized agreement back to the commission.

