Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Youth Prevention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clatsop County assessment finds communication and education gaps in youth substance‑use prevention
Summary
A county-conducted youth prevention needs assessment identified gaps in communication, mental health supports and community coordination; staff recommended capacity building, planning and use of evidence-based strategies. The committee will pursue further data and planning.
Lisa, the county presenter, told the Human Services Advisory Committee that the youth prevention needs assessment found communication and education, mental health support, social environment and community resources were the primary themes needing action.
The assessment drew on quantitative sources (an educator survey developed with CBH and the statewide Student Health Survey, with roughly 294 eighth‑grade and 243 eleventh‑grade responses countywide) and qualitative work (16 community leader interviews, five youth focus groups and two adult focus groups). Lisa said the team used a prevention framework (primary, secondary and tertiary prevention) and emphasized starting preventive work before eighth grade.
Why it matters: committee members said clear countywide data and coordinated planning are needed so prevention efforts reach more youth and so interventions can be evaluated. Commissioner Thompson backed broader data sharing, saying program data “should not be a problem getting” because the CCO and providers already report it to other entities.
Key findings and next steps: the presentation noted that only “7 to 9 percent” of school staff reported feeling adequately trained to address student substance use; youth reported receiving inconsistent messages from adults and getting much information via social media. Lisa recommended a three‑phase approach: capacity building (including outreach to partners such as school districts and health care), planning using evidence‑based strategies from SAMHSA’s strategic prevention framework, and evaluation to measure implementation outcomes. She said the committee plans to present to the county superintendent and to incorporate these results into the county’s upcoming data capacity work.
Members asked for more granular data to inform planning, including breakdowns by district and age, and flagged inclusion of tobacco in future analyses. Lisa said the full assessment will be circulated and the committee will use its data‑capacity assessment to determine what additional data are needed and how to proceed.
The committee is expected to spend the next meeting on the data capacity assessment before returning to planning and strategy.
