Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Family Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Appeals panel hears argument over alimony duration and surviving provisions in Popp case
Summary
Joanne Popp, representing herself, argued the probate court misapplied durational‑limit standards and improperly modified alimony amount without giving effect to the separation agreement's surviving provisions; appellee counsel defended the court’s careful factual findings. The panel took the case under advisement.
The appeals court heard argument in Joanne Popp v. Robert Popp on whether a probate court correctly modified alimony and applied durational limits and surviving provisions in the parties’ separation agreement.
Appellant Joanne Popp, appearing pro se, argued the trial court erred by applying a "here‑and‑now" durational standard for deviation and then modifying the alimony amount without giving due weight to the separation agreement’s surviving provision that limited when expenses could be offset. She told the panel the court discounted legitimate expenses and failed to honor the parties’ original intent about modification triggers.
Appellee counsel James Rady responded that the probate court carefully reviewed the evidence and made detailed factual findings (the record contains extensive findings of fact), applying statutory durational limits and the relevant case law; he defended the court’s termination date and amount as within its discretion.
Justices questioned whether trial court practice correctly reconciled preexisting settlement terms, durational limits established by higher courts, and the standards applied when a judge exercises discretion after durational limits run. Argument concluded with the court taking the appeal under advisement.
