Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Garfield Public School District board approves consent agenda; trustee recuses from special-education hire
Summary
The Garfield Public School District Board approved routine consent items, heard brief staffing and facilities reports, and recorded a trustee recusal from a recommended assistant supervisor for special education because of a family relationship.
The Garfield Public School District Board of Trustees met and approved the consent agenda while hearing short administrative updates on staffing and facilities. A trustee announced a recusal from a recommended special-education appointment because of a family relationship to the candidate.
Doctor Tomko told the board the district is preparing hires to replace retirements, working on budget projections to present in the coming weeks and developing new programs. “So progress,” he said, summarizing the administration’s work on personnel and program planning.
Mr. Labou reported the district recently submitted transportation and special-education reports to the Department of Education, is preparing the comprehensive M1 report, and has addressed facilities issues as heating systems were turned on for the season.
During questions about a listed appointment for assistant supervisor for special education, an unidentified trustee asked whether the position was new, whether it had been posted and whether interviews had been held. Doctor Tomko replied the position is longstanding (he said it has been in place “for 20 something years”), that it was posted within the district, that interviews were conducted and that the person named on the agenda was his recommendation.
When asked whether recusal was required for that agenda item, a trustee said they would recuse because of a family connection to the candidate, stating, “She’s my husband’s father’s brother’s son’s daughter, which makes her a second cousin once removed.” The trustee’s recusal was acknowledged on the record; no formal vote on that specific appointment was recorded in the transcript excerpt.
A motion to approve consent agenda items 6.1 and 6.2 was made and seconded. Roll-call voting recorded multiple “Aye” responses, at least one “No,” and one absence (Trustee Ramos); the chair announced the motion carried. Later, the board moved to adjourn and the meeting concluded after a roll-call affirmation of the motion.
The board did not receive public comments on agenda items during the meeting excerpted in the transcript. The administration said more detailed budget projections and program proposals would be provided to the board in the coming weeks.
